




(l to r) Council members Ruth Atkin, Dick Kassis (mayor), Nora Davis, Ken Bukowski (vice-mayor), and John Fricke
The Two "No" Votes:
Bukowski Cries "Revenge";
John Fricke Calls Censure "Toothless"
__________________________________________________
Council Also Votes to Cut Public Comment Period from 5 minutes to 3 minutes
by Brian Donahue and Tracy Schroth
The Emeryville City Council last Tuesday voted 3-2 to officially censure Vice-Mayor Ken Bukowski for unlawful and unethical conduct while in office. The strongly worded resolution criticized Bukowski for bringing "disrepute" on the city in general and the City Council in particular. The censure sought to publicly condemn Bukowski's actions and invite "the reaffirmation of his oath of office and commitment to govern his activities as an elected official ... in full compliance with ... all laws of the State of California and the City of Emeryville."
Bukowski and Council Member John Fricke voted against the censure. Bukowski characterized the move as revenge, while Fricke called it a "toothless" show for the cameras, noting that aside from public humliation, there is no consequence. He noted that the three Bukowski condemners were enthusiastic Bukowski supporters just a few short years ago, despite their knowledge of Bukowski's transgressions (although the list has grown since then). Council members Nora Davis and Ruth Atkin ran on the same re-election slate with Bukowski, with the active support of (now-Mayor) Dick Kassis, in 2007.
Bukowski, meanwhile, characterized the censure as an act of revenge, claiming that his fellow council members were punishing him for voting against the city renewing its contract with City Attorney Mike Biddle.
This is the second time the Bukowski censure resolution has been put to a vote. Council Member Ruth Atkin introduced the same resolution at a Jan. 20 Council meeting. But, after a lengthy discussion, she withdrew it, preventing a vote. At the time, Council Member Nora Davis indicated she was against the censure and that Bukowski had served the city well. Last Tuesday, however, she voted in favor of censuring Bukowski.
In other business, the Council voted 4-1 (Fricke against) to reduce the public comment period from 5 minutes to 3 minutes per citizen. They also voted to ban dogs from the council chambers.
Here is a list of Bukowski's offenses cited in the resolution:
- Failure to pay business license tax on his Doyle Street rental property.
- Disclosure to the public of confidential closed-session items discussed by the City Council. There is speculation that the disclosure had to do with the firing of a city staffer who alleged that the firing was racially motivated. Bukowski sided with the employee, publicly criticizing the handling of the case by then City Manager John Flores and City Attorney Mike Biddle. The city ultimately settled the case for $3.6 million.
- Failure to file the necessary campaign finance reports between October 2003 and 2006, "despite repeated reminders and requests from the City Clerk’s Office and referral to the Fair Political Practices Commission." Bukowski has since been fined by the Fair Political Practices Commission, according to the resolution.
- Soliciting and obtaining personal loans from individuals that exceed limits and terms set by the Political Reform Act and not repaying at least one of those loans. It was disclosed at a public meeting several months ago that Bukowski received a loan from Emeryville developer Francis Collins.
- Entering into a consulting contract with Paxio, Inc., an Internet service provider that also has a contract with the city to supply services, and failing to disclose that consulting agreement to his fellow City Council members.
- Participating in and influencing decisions of the City Council regarding Paxio while on Paxio's payroll.


