City Council Grants Rich Developer $2.5 Million in Taxpayer Money, Angrily Dismisses Residents' Complaints

by Juanita Carroll Young and Tracy Schroth

The City Council Tuesday approved the $2.5 million taxpayer subsidy to Wareham Development to build a 58-foot office building on the corner of Hollis and Powell streets, next to the Elevation 22 residential complex. Council member John Fricke voted against. Vice Mayor Ken Bukowski abstained from the discussion and the vote.

Here is a recap of the public comments:

The residents of Elevation 22 are requesting noise abatement in exchange for the approval of the project. They also want a contact person at Wareham who they can call with complaints.

Several (8) Emeryville residents complained about the Council consistently giving huge taxpayer subsidies to rich developers, and asked "why?" This project has also been granted a height variance to exceed the maximum height allowed - again, residents asked, "Why?"

Several residents disagreed with the Council's characterization of the existing building on the site - which housed a law office and an architecture firm - as "blight." In fact, resident Brian Donahue pointed out that the building meets the city's definition of "architecturally significant." Many residents see the proposed new building as yet another big, bland, contemporary office building with no aesthetic value. One speaker suggested that the Council get some design advice from architects who work in Emeryville.

In addition to the residents who often attend Council meetings to make public comment, there were some new members of RULE (Residents United for a Livable Emeryville) who voiced concern about the Wareham project, among them a Pacific Park Plaza resident.

Council member Nora Davis and Mayor Dick Kassis were openly hostile in their response to public comment, suggesting that these subsidies are necessary to lure development, which will generate big tax revenue in return. They dismissed residents' request that developers be required to provide some community benefits in return for the millions of dollars in subsidies they receive. Not only is Wareham Development excused from providing any city amenities, it got the green light to exceed the allowable height limit - allowing the building to cast an even larger shadow on the Doyle Street Greenway, a bike and pedestrian path that runs from Powell Street to the Berkeley border.

John Fricke argued that Emeryville is a desirable location to do businesses; the City no longer needs to attract developers with big subsidies. He noted that 20 years ago, when Emeryville began doling out taxpayer money to developers, the Council urged residents to be patient, that these projects would return the favor in spades (in the form of tax revenue and city amenities).

"We're still waiting," Fricke said.

City Council Poised to Grant $2.5 Million in Taxpayer Money to Wealthy Developer

Edited version of email message from Council Member John Fricke, sent to residents Thursday, May 14

At the upcoming City Council meeting on Tuesday, May 20, the Council is poised to grant $2.5 million in taxpayer money to a developer (Wareham Development) to construct a 58-foot office building on the northeast corner of Hollis and Powell streets (next to the Elevation 22 residential complex).

I will vote no because:
(1) we should stop giving millions of dollars in taxpayer money to developers
(2) the project violates the city’s zoning ordinance (the developer is asking to exceed the height limit)
(3) an appeal filed by residents of Elevation 22 objecting to the project is still pending
(4) the project will not be required to adopt policies that would reduce the use of single-occupant vehicles

Elevation 22 residents object to the planning commission’s approval of the project on a number of grounds, including the excessive height of the proposed building. Residents are also concerned about noise expected from equipment on the roof of the building (they have complained of incessant noise coming from the roof of an existing office building across the street that was constructed by the same developer).

The city staff report implies that if the city doesn't grant Wareham millions of dollars in subsidies, the project won’t happen. The City Council majority embraces this assumption. This project is yet another example of the Council granting millions in taxpayer money without demanding any concrete benefits in return.

I believe the developer would construct the project without the subsidy. However, if Wareham decides it will not do the project without the subsidy, then we should wait until the market improves -- and see what happens. Once the economy recovers, the project can likely occur without a subsidy.

(The staff report on this project is not yet available on the city’s website. But whenever its posted, one can access staff reports at
http://www.ci.emeryville.ca.us/media/ )

Whenever new development projects seek City Council approval, I call for a condition of approval that the project charge for parking, commonly called unbundled parking. I also seek to require that each resident and/or employee associated with the project receive a free AC Transit bus pass. Bulk passes can be purchased for far less than the cost of one bus pass. These and other policies (such as requiring car-share cars) seek to reduce single-occupant vehicle use and encourage public transit use, bicycling, and walking. None of the other Council members has supported these conditions, including for the project to be considered on Tuesday.

I receive many responses to my broadcast email messages. Some of the responses I receive seem to be addressed to a larger audience. I don’t have a blog on my web page that can receive such messages, but I’m trying something new with this message.

By clicking on the "comment" link at the end of this story, you can post your comment for others to read.

Speaking of reducing single-occupant vehicles . . .

Happy Bike to Work Day!

www.johnfricke.com/BikeToWorkDay14may2009a.jpg
www.johnfricke.com/BikeToWorkDay14may2009b.jpg

The woman on the right is none other than Alameda County’s Bike Commuter of the Year, Laura McCamy! Laura lives in Emeryville. Here’s more information about Laura:

http://btwd.bayareabikes.org/node/102

Best,

John

John Fricke
1057 43rd Street
Emeryville, CA 94608

510/601-8846

jfricke@JohnFricke.com

www.JohnFricke.com

About the Survey

The Who, Where, and How of Resident Survey
In response to readers' questions, a description of the survey cited in the previous story is provided below:

The survey was conducted jointly by the East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy (EBASE), UNITE HERE Local 2850, and Residents United for a Livable Emeryville (RULE). The survey was conducted over a one-month period (in February 2009) by a team of volunteers who went door-to-door in every neighborhood in Emeryville. On average, five teams of 2 volunteers conducted the surveys on 12 separate occasions, questioning more than 400 residents across the city, including North Emeryville, the Triangle neighborhood, Watergate, The Terraces, Archstone Apartments, 1500 Park Street, and the Emeryville Artists' Cooperative. Residents of Pacific Park Plaza (PPP) were not surveyed because volunteers were denied entrance. They were told that PPP does not allow soliciting. All the residents surveyed were chosen at random.

The 7-question survey asked residents their opinions about development in town, requesting that they prioritize their top three concerns or demands (see survey results - link in previous story - for more details). Survey questions were based on feedback received during a series of focus groups. Among the focus group participants were Emeryville teachers, former city council members, religious leaders, school board members, youth, small business owners, and residents. A professional, outside facilitator was hired to conduct all of the focus groups.