Tuesday, December 23, 2008

Channel 5 CBS News Reports on Emeryville's Threatened Economy


On the evening news last night:


Emeryville Struggles As Shopping Lags
EMERYVILLE (CBS 5) ― The economic downturn has spelled trouble for many Bay Area cities, but one of the hardest hit has been the shopping enclave of Emeryville. Click here for the story.

Sunday, December 21, 2008

Is Emeryville's Retail Economy Sustainable? Check out today's New York Times



by Marc Albert

A lengthy story on the front page of the business section of today's New York Times
suggests that Emeryville's renaissance as a big box mecca may backfire -- as worried consumers drastically cut spending.

The story, A City That Shopped Till it Dropped chronicles the waning fortunes of local retailers and the repercussions for a city dependant on sales taxes.

The Times describes Emeryville as having "hitched its wagon over the last several decades to what seemed like the limitless ability of American shoppers to spend money." The strategy is suddenly a poor bet. The Times said 25 percent of the city's revenue comes from sales taxes and "'collections fell 23 percent in the third quarter this year from the same period last year, among the steepest drops in the state."

With the expansion of the Bay Street mall (pictured above) looming on the City Council's agenda, the article asks, "Did a city that worked so hard to clean up the mess left by abandoned steel mills and rubber plants ultimately trade one kind of urban blight for another, more modern variety?"

___________________________________

The City Council majority continues to promote big development (and millions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies to build these developments) with promises of big tax revenues in return -- to pay for parks, child care, sidewalks, and better youth and senior programs. All of those promises may turn out to be nothing more than pie-in-the-sky.

Tuesday, December 9, 2008

Vice-Mayor's Decision Not to Pay Tax Ranks Among "Worst Ideas of the Week" in SF Examiner

Emeryville Deserves a Mayor "who strives for solutions, not one who stoops to excuses," says Examiner

Ken Bukowski's failure to pay business taxes to the city of which he is now vice-mayor and formerly mayor has received a place among the San Francisco Examiner's "Worst Ideas of the Week" for the week of Dec. 7, 2008.

Here's what the Examiner said (for full list of the week's Worst Ideas, click here):

Bad example

Emeryville mayor doesn’t pay his business taxes

The details: The mayor of Emeryville, a small city on the east side of the Bay Bridge, says he can’t — and won’t — pay his business taxes. Mayor Ken Bukowoski has told reporters that he is not only opposed to Emeryville’s business tax license fee, but he couldn’t pay it even if he wanted to. Bukowski, a 21-year-veteran of the City Council, is apparently trying to live off his small stipend for being a city official and some rental income. He says he’s a victim of the poor economy, but Emeryville deserves a leader who strives for solutions, not one who stoops to excuses.

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

Taxpayers Foot Bill for Clean Up of Vice Mayor's Property





Add Image














by Brian Donahue

After Emeryville's vice mayor was cited for health code violations at his Doyle Street property due to excessive trash and other debris, and failed to clean it up, the city ordered crews to haul away the garbage - at taxpayers' expense.

An abatement order was issued in May, requiring immediate remediation of health and fire code violations at Vice Mayor Ken Bukowski's property at 5876 and 5878-1/2 Doyle Street, just south of 59th Street. The order was issued in response to neighbors' complaints of garbage spilling over the property line and onto the sidewalk. There are two structures on the property, Bukowski's home, and a six-unit apartment house that the vice mayor rents out.

After Bukowski failed to comply with the clean-up order, despite several extensions, the city was forced to take matters into its own hands, according to Assistant City Attorney Michael Guina. "The City of Emeryville had to clean it up," Guina said. He did not say what it cost, but did say that "Mr. Bukowski has been made aware that he must pay back the City." As of last week, Bukowski had not done so.

The abatement order was sent via certified mail to Bukowski, citing five code violations, including fire hazard, maintaining a rodent harborage, garbage accumulation, unlawful property nuisance, and unlawful open storage of materials. Before the clean-up, liquid that appeared to be antifreeze was seen flowing from the property into a nearby storm drain (see above photo). Local storm drains empty directly into San Francisco Bay without treatment.

A woman employed by a neighboring business, who asked not to be identified, said it appeared that some of the tenants of the property were conducting an automobile salvage operation. "They drop off truckloads of oily, greasy parts on to the sidewalk and proceed to take them apart right there, blocking the sidewalk," the neighbor said. She also complained of noise at the site.

Bukowski blames the problem on irresponsible tenants, and believes that the tenants, not he, should have received the abatement order.

Sunday, November 23, 2008

Comments From Our Readers


Comment re:
Emeryville City Council to Developers: The Laws We Make, We'll Break for You:

This seems to be a ongoing theme from the city council. It seems John Fricke is the only one not in the back pocket of developers. Why can't the other council members stand up and represent the people who actually elected them? They are carving the city's history up into little pieces and serving it on a silver platter to whichever developer comes along, ignoring critical quality of life concerns which the municipal code was created to protect. Emeryville has a long history of corruption and it seems to be continuing on unabated.

I, for one, have had enough. When are the people of Emeryville going to stand up and throw out those elected officials who care more about helping developers increase their profit margin than the quality of life for people who actually live here? I am sick and tired of the constant pandering that goes on from the majority of the city council to developers who are only interested in making money while Emeryville residents suffer.

We need to recall those council members who betrayed our trust.

We need a municipal code that is strong enough not to be simply swept aside whenever a developer comes around and sheds a tear.

We need to make ourselves heard by complaining to the media and marching in the streets to embarrass those rascals into stopping their attacks on our quality of life.

If you all want to organize a demonstration, count me in.

If anyone wants to read more about the two projects, here are the links:

Project at 39th and Adeline:
http://www.oaklandnet.com/government/ceda/revised/planningzoning/MajorProjectsSection/39th-and-AdelineEIR.html

Papermill Project:
http://www.ci.emeryville.ca.us/planning/majorprojects.html


Doug Bright

Friday, November 21, 2008

Emeryville City Council to Developers: The Laws We Make, We'll Break for You














Developers Get to Make Noise, Chop Down Trees, Demolish Historic Buildings, and Exceed Height Limits - Despite Laws That Say They Can't

Here's a list of the laws recently ignored by the City Council majority (edited excerpt from Nov. 19 email to residents from Council Member John Fricke):

Significant commercial structures shall be preserved
Ordinance adopted by the City Council in 2007. However, each time a developer has sought to demolish a significant commercial structure, the Council majority has said yes. At last night’s meeting, this happened with two structures (pictured above), one at Doyle & Powell Streets (above, left) and the second at Adeline & 39th Streets (above, right).

Strict Height Limits on New Buildings
The City's zoning ordinance places strict limits on the height of new buildings to be constructed. However, in addition to allowing the demolition of the historic brick building now located at Adeline & 39th Streets, the Council approved the new project proposed for the site, even though it exceeds the maximum building height allowed.

Limits on Density (residential units per acre) allowed in certain neighborhoods
The Council last night approved the project at Doyle & Powell even though the project exceeds the density allowed, and significantly exceeds the residential density at the nearby Elevation 22 and Doyle Street condominium projects.

Street trees must be preserved
At last night’s meeting, the Council postponed a decision on the developer’s request to remove 12 mature street trees at Doyle & Powell until an arborist’s report is prepared.

Construction noise is strictly limited to weekdays from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m.
At last night’s meeting, the Council voted to allow construction at the Bay Street shopping mall on 10 Saturdays (7 a.m. to 6 p.m.) and 10 Sundays (8 a.m. to 5 p.m.) through the holiday shopping season. These 10 Saturdays and Sundays are in addition to 10 Saturdays already granted and that the contractor has used. The second waiver granted last night was to the City's public works department to dredge the marina boating channel on Saturdays (9 a.m. to 6 p.m.) through December, and to work 24 hours a day on weekdays until completion of the project.
______________________________

No wonder developers propose projects in flagrant violation of the City's zoning laws. They know those laws are meaningless.

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Ken Bukowski Tax Story Hits Front Page of East Bay Express

East Bay Express Calls Mayor's Explanation of Financial Hardship "Suspicious."

The latest issue of the East Bay Express features Mayor Ken Bukowski's failure to pay Emeryville business taxes for the past four years.

The article also reports that Bukowski is being sued by the widow of a man he accidentally hit and killed while driving his SUV on a rainy night last December. The victim, Michael Smela, a Novartis security guard and former San Francisco police officer, was struck and killed by Bukowski's vehicle while walking across Hollis Street in Emeryville the evening of Dec. 6. Bukowski had just left a community meeting held at the Novartis complex. The city is paying Bukowski's legal fees in connection with the wrongful death suit.

Here is the story in the Express:

East Bay Express

A Mayor Who Doesn't Pay Taxes

Emeryville's Ken Bukowski disagrees with a city tax and is behind on property taxes. And that's just part of his problems.

November 19, 2008


Ken Bukowski.
The mayor owes property taxes on his home (above, left) and city taxes on his rental property (above, right).
_______________________

Emeryville is the Little City That Could. Over the years, it has built a retail and high-tech business juggernaut along Interstate 80 and has become the envy of cities throughout the East Bay. Emeryville's tax revenues from all that retail also have kept the city afloat, while other cities have floundered, and will help it weather the current recession. But there is one Emeryville leader who is not doing all he can to contribute to the city's financial well-being — Mayor Ken Bukowski.

Bukowski, who has served on the Emeryville City Council for 21 years, has not paid his city business license taxes for the past four years, according to City Manager Patrick O'Keeffe. The 56-year-old Bukowski said in an interview last week that he hasn't paid the tax because he's broke, although he acknowledged that he has publically opposed the tax and thinks it's unfair. Public records also indicate that although Bukowski has fallen behind on his property taxes and is by no means a wealthy man, he has managed to pay some of his other bills over the years — just not to the city he serves and leads.

Bukowski's beef with the city business license tax began in 2004. In September of that year, city officials decided to start enforcing the tax on residential property landlords without informing all of the city council. The tax itself had been approved by the council in 1986, but the city had only enforced it on commercial property owners for its first eighteen years. Bukowski, who owns and rents out a modest six-unit building next to his small home on Doyle Street, immediately protested the decision. "It may be legal, but it's not right," he said at a council meeting, according to a report at the time in the Oakland Tribune. "I disagreed with how the tax was implemented," he told Full Disclosure last week.

Still, the mayor maintained that his failure to pay the tax is not some sort of protest. "I'll pay it as soon as possible," he said. Bukowski's income consists of the rent he collects from his tenants and the $800 stipend he receives from the city for serving on the council, although he said he recently got a new job as a telecommunications consultant.

According to O'Keeffe, Bukowski hasn't paid the city business license tax since Emeryville officials began enforcing it in 2004. The tax is only $25 a year, and as of last week, Bukowski owed $100 plus interest, O'Keeffe said. Public records also show that the mayor didn't pay his property taxes on his home last year. According to the Alameda County Assessor's Office, he owes $1,719 in back property taxes, including late fees. The mayor's tax problems were first reported last month on The Secret News, a blog that covers Emeryville.

Yet despite his unpaid debts, Bukowski's claim that he hasn't paid the city's business license tax because of monetary problems — and not because he opposes the tax itself — is suspicious. After all, the tax is minimal, and public records show that his financial problems haven't stopped him from paying his other taxes, including his property taxes on his rental property. A public records search found no liens against him for failure to pay state or local income taxes or any other bills. In addition, records show that while he wasn't paying the $25 he owed the city each year, he somehow had enough money to pay about $3,000 annually to the county for his property taxes on his rental property — on time, without incurring penalties.

At least one of Bukowski's colleagues on the city council is concerned about the message the mayor is sending by not paying his city taxes. "That troubles me a lot — the fact that he apparently has not paid because he doesn't agree with it," said Councilman John Fricke. "I believe it encourages others to not pay the tax." According to public records, the city placed liens on thousands of pieces of rental property throughout Emeryville, including Bukowski's, for not paying their business license taxes. That's a lot of tax scofflaws for a city with only 6,815 residents, according to the 2006 Census estimate.

But Bukowski's taxes are only part of his problems. Prior to last year, he was best known as the East Bay's leading advocate for adding a rail line to the new Bay Bridge. After he lost the battle in the late 1990s, he receded into obscurity until late 2007 when he suddenly shot back into the headlines after striking and killing a pedestrian while driving his SUV. On the evening of December 6, Bukowski killed Michael Smela, 56, of Oakley, on an Emeryville street during a light rain.

Bukowski had just left a community meeting that night at Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics. The mayor was driving on Hollis Street (not far from this newspaper's office) when his SUV slammed into Smela, a security guard at Novartis and a former San Francisco police officer. Smela, who was wearing a brightly colored jacket, appears to have been crossing the street outside of the crosswalk. Bukowski told police that he didn't see Smela and that he was driving below the speed limit. Bukowski was not arrested, and according to published reports, police did not test the mayor for drugs or alcohol.

In May of this year, Smela's widow, Lynda Lopez-Smela, filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Bukowski and the city. The city is paying Bukowski's legal bills, and according to court documents, lawyers representing the mayor and the city maintain that Smela was responsible for his own death. "There was no question that this was a tragic accident," attorney Mark Hazelwood told Full Disclosure. "It's apparent from the evidence that Mr. Smela was jaywalking in the middle of the block."

Lynda Lopez-Smela has yet to reveal how much money she's seeking in damages. The two sides tried to settle the case with the help of mediation, but got nowhere. Lopez-Smela adamantly denies that her husband was to blame. "We are confident," her attorney Daniel Crawford said in an interview, "that the facts will show that this was caused by the negligence of the mayor."

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Channel 7 Picks Up Secret News Story About Emeryville Mayor

Channel 7 Reports Mayor Failed to Pay Business Tax

One of the top stories on Channel 7 ABC News at 6 p.m. last night was Mayor Ken Bukowski's failure to pay business tax on his Emeryville rental units. The story was first broken by The Secret News on October 20.

The text and link to the video are below:

Video

Emeryville Mayor Can't Pay Business Taxes

Tuesday, November 11, 2008 | 7:04 PM

One East Bay mayor is refusing to pay his business license tax. It's an important source of revenue for any city, but the Emeryville mayor has a reason for not paying -- one that many people around the Bay Area understand all too well.

Mayor Ken Bukowoski opposed Emeryville's business tax license when it came before the city council four years ago.

"I do think it should be changed," said Mayor Bukowski.

And ever since then, he hasn't paid a cent on the tax. Even though, as a landlord who owns rental units, he is required by law to do so. Exactly how much Mayor Bukowski owes is unknown. It's likely a few hundred dollars.

"I don't encourage anybody not to pay the biz license tax," said Bukowski.

It's not his opposition to the tax that's keeping him from paying. The mayor is like thousands of others around the region. The property he lives in and those rental units are on the brink of foreclosure.

"It's embarrassing to have a financial hardship especially in my position where people, I guess, expect that a mayor is supposed to have a lot of money," said Bukowski.

He says it's been a rough year. Just days after he became mayor last December, he hit and killed a pedestrian crossing the street while driving on a rainy night. And Bukowski lives off his rental income and the small stipend he gets for being on the city council. He says he fell behind on his mortgage after a series of vacancies.

Emeryville is predicting it got could lose about $500,000 in revenue in coming years and the city council is currently debating whether to raise taxes for business and property owners here.

"I would be uncomfortable saying, 'Look we need to raise revenue,' if for example I was not paying the business license tax," said John Fricke, on the Emeryville City Council.

Others say they pay their share and the mayor should too.

"It does kind of make me mad to see that someone is not paying their business taxes," said Sebrena Flennauch, owner of It's A Breeze One Hour Photo.

The business license tax brings in about $2.5 million a year for Emeryville. The city attorney's office has warned Bukowski he needs to pay up.

"I really feel sorry for people out there who have a similar condition. It's a crime to be broke in America," said Bukowski.

(Copyright ©2008 KGO-TV/DT. All Rights Reserved.)

Thursday, November 6, 2008

Immigrant Housekeepers Continue Fight for Back Wages at Woodfin Hotel

March for Woodfin Hotel Workers' Back Wages
Monday, Nov. 17 at 5 pm

Join the march from the Woodfin Hotel at 5800 Shellmound, Emeryville to Emeryville City Hall (1333 Park St., Emeryville).

by Reem Assil

It's been close to three years since Woodfin owner Sam Hardage refused to pay about $200,000 in back wages to dozens of hotel housekeepers. Meanwhile, Hardage's business has spent about twice that on largely unsuccessful lawsuits trying to throw out Emeryville's living wage law. Next week, on Mon, Nov 17, the latest chapter in this struggle opens with a hearing at the Emeryville City Council and a 300-person march called "Let justice roll down."

One worker, Lorena, had this to say about conditions before the living wage and fair workload law went into effect: "Sometimes I couldn't even stop to get a glass of water. I would get home with my feet very swollen, my hands swollen, and with a headache. When we couldn't finish, they made us punch out after 8 hours and told us to finish. I even started wondering if we were living in times of slavery."

Go to for the http://www.workingeastbay.org/woodfinblog for the full story.

Please join the East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy (EBASE) on Monday, November 17th at 5 PM at the Woodfin Suites Hotel (5800 Shellmound, Emeryville) for a march from the hotel to Emeryville City Council before the hearing. For more information or to RSVP, visit www.workingeastbay.org/Woodfin_hearing.

Reem Assil is a community organizer for EBASE. Reem is inspired by both her love for community and her understanding of the importance of building power in the labor movement. Her formative experience with coalition building and community organizing comes out of organizing in the Arab American community, in which her heart lies.

(Photo courtesy of EBASE, www.workingeastbay.org)

Sunday, October 26, 2008

"Stop The Noise" Say Residents Near Anna Yates Construction















Residents Protest City Council's Refusal to Hear Their Concerns;
City Manager Grants Contractor Waiver of Noise Ordinance to Work Saturdays

by Brian Donahue and Marc Albert

After officials refused to hear their grievances, a group of residents living near Anna Yates Elementary School took to the streets Saturday morning, protesting the city’s decision to waive its noise ordinance to allow Saturday construction at the school.

“There’s no accountability, that’s the problem,” said resident Mike Pirsch, referring to the City Council. Pirsch, who led the protest, said he is incensed that Mayor Ken Bukowski refused to allow public comment on the issue at the City Council meeting last Tuesday. More than 50 neighborhood residents have signed a petition asking the Council to enforce the noise ordinance, which prohibits construction work on weekends.

Said Pirsch, “Ken Bukowski has been in office for 21 years and he doesn’t have a clue about parliamentary procedure.“

Local police made a strong showing to keep watch over the protest, at times outnumbering the actual picketers, who lined up on the 43rd Street sidewalk outside Anna Yates. In an apparent attempt to appease the protestors, Wanda Stewart, public information officer for Emeryville Unified School District, offered free tickets to a nearby movie theater.

Neighbors said contractors began firing up their heavy equipment at 7:25 am Saturday, more than an hour and a half before the start-up time granted by City Manager Patrick O’Keeffe’s waiver. Neighbors cited numerous other noise violations, including two occasions when diesel power generators rumbled through the night. Extensive remodeling has been underway at the school for months. School officials hope to have construction work completed in time for the start of classes in January.

When residents tried to present their complaints to the City Council last Tuesday, they were told that because the Council lacked a quorum, citizens would not permitted to speak. Then, City Manager O’Keeffe granted contractors a waiver of the City noise ordinance, allowing Saturday construction. O’Keeffe explained at the meeting that “administrative” waivers are warranted when an “urgent situation” exists.

At the onset of construction, School District officials assured the City that work would be completed on time and that there would be no need for weekend construction. However, they now say that contractors must work every Saturday in order to meet the January deadline.
________________________________________
Photos (from left): Construction at Anna Yates Elementary School; A picket sign protesting the City's Council's refusal to hear public comment on the issue of construction noise at the site; and residents Mike Pirsch and Reggie protest City's waiver of noise ordinance to allow Saturday construction.

Monday, October 20, 2008

Emeryville Mayor Failed to Pay Business Tax for Four Years; Also Owes $1,700 in Property Taxes and Fines


By Tracy Schroth, Marc Albert and Brian Donahue

Emeryville Mayor Ken Bukowski owes at least $2,000 in business and property taxes and the fines continue to stack up.

The City sent Bukowski a certified letter several months ago demanding that he obtain a business license and pay the business tax on his Doyle Street rental property, which he has failed to pay every year since the tax law was enforced in 2004. But Bukowski said he doesn't have the money, and is concerned that the law would allow the city to inspect the property "at any time, 24-hours-a-day, seven days a week,” which he said he is not comfortable with.

Meanwhile, Bukowski says he was unaware of his property tax debt - more than $1,700, according to the Alameda County Assessor's office.

Emeryville's Business License Tax

“I didn’t pay the thing,” Bukowski said of the business license tax, explaining that he voted against it when it came before the Council in 2004. “I was against it." He added that he was one of many residents who didn't pay the tax, arguing that the ordinance should be amended to exempt property owners earning less than $100,000 in gross rents. He said he would see if the Chamber of Commerce would support such an amendment.

Bukowski estimates that he owes a few hundred dollars and said he will pay it when he can. "I'm having financial problems and it's a low priority. Do you want to see a list of my creditors? Right now, my PG&E bill is more important," he said. "Is it a crime to be broke in America?" City Finance Department officials did not return calls asking how much Bukowski actually owes.

He said he gets income from his rental property and a monthly stipend of $1,100 as a City Council member.

Bukowski owns two residential structures, a six-unit building at 5876-78 Doyle Street, and a two-unit next door at 5880, which he claims as his primary residence. He said he currently rents six of the eight units but would not say how much rent he collects.

The business license tax is calculated based on the amount of gross rent. For most businesses, the tax is equal to the greater of $25 or .0008 % of annual gross receipts. Business license taxes declared delinquent are subject to a penalty of 5% a month up to a maximum of 25%. In addition, anyone who fails to pay the business tax is subject to interest at 1-1/2% per month on the amount of tax and penalties from the date on which the business tax first became delinquent.


Property Taxes

According to the Alameda County Assessor's office, Bukowski has fallen behind on his property taxes for the structure at 5880 Doyle Street, but is current on the property taxes levied against the second, larger rental structure next door. He owes $1,719.56 and counting.

Tracy Schroth is an Emeryville resident who believes in honest and transparent government that is accountable to the people it serves. She is concerned that the City Council majority is putting monied special interests before the needs and desires of the community.

Marc Albert has been a reporter at three radio stations and seven newspapers over the past 20 years. An East Bay resident since 1987, he lived in Emeryville from 1997 to 2008 and is still keenly interested in a community he considers home.

Brian Donahue has lived and worked in Emeryville for 28 years. He and his wife, and young daughter, live in the Emeryville Artists' Cooperative. Brian has been a longtime activist, working for transparent government and better of quality of life for the residents; he's not very popular with the City Council majority.


Thursday, October 16, 2008

Emeryville's $70 Million "Bailout"


Subsidies to Developers Will Cost $7,000 per Resident -- Three Times that of the Federal Bailout


Edited version of Council Member John Fricke's Letter to Emeryville Residents
(sent via email on Sept. 28, 2008)

The Bush Administration’s $700 billion bailout of Wall Street has been characterized as the largest government bailout of private enterprise in U.S. history. The bailout will cost about $2,300 per man, woman, and child in our country. That sounds like a lot, but from the perspective of an Emeryville resident, this figure is quite modest.

The Emeryville City Council majority has expressed support for granting tens of millions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies to developers for a series of projects likely to be approved in the next year or two. By my count, total subsidies for these development projects will reach at least $70 million - $7,000 for each and every man, woman, and child in Emeryville, three times the amount per person of the federal bailout.

Here's the tally (these numbers are estimates, as the City Council has refused to divulge the actual amounts):

Bay Street Mall Site B -------------- $48 million (based on 2006 figures)
30-story hotel, chain department
store, and parking garage slated for site

Public Market Expansion ------------- $10 million
Office space, 52,000 square feet
of retail, and up to 340 new
housing units

Transit Center ------------ $3-6 million

EmeryStation Triangle ------------- $3-6 million

Gateway ----------------- Unknown

"Upgrade" of Pac & Save to
Safeway ----------------- Unknown

Thursday, September 25, 2008

Council Disregards Residents' Concerns about Bay Street Development



by Sandra Stewart and Reem Assil

About 20 residents and workers packed Emeryville City Hall for the Sept. 16th City Council meeting to urge the Council to guarantee more community benefits out of the future (Site B) Bay Street project. The project is an extension of the Bay Street Mall on Shellmound Street. The developer, Madison Marquette, is proposing a 30-story hotel -- the city's sixth hotel -- condos, and more retail, including a chain department store.

The Citizens' appeal to the Council was coordinated by a group of concerned residents and the East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy (EBASE), a social and economic justice organization committed to responsible development in Emeryville and the East Bay. Residents expressed concern with the City’s approach to the development, including private promises to developers of tens of millions in public money to fund the project, and giving them exclusive rights to the site. On September 16th, Madison Marquette requested an extension of their Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA), which guarantees that the City will not open bidding to other developers. While the usual timeline of an ENA is 6-9 months, Madison Marquette has repeatedly received extensions from the Council for the past 4 years.

Residents demanded more tangible benefits of public investment and asked the Council to prove how the community will directly benefit from the development relative to what it will cost them in taxpayer dollars -- an estimated $47 million -- and quality of life.

“I’m not anti-development,” said Ruth Majors, a Watergate resident of 24 years, “ We need developers to pay the bills, but show us how they are going to pay the bills.”

Many residents expressed concern about City officials’ willingness to accommodate developers at any expense to the taxpayers. North Emeryville resident Judy Timmel noted that Emeryville has become one of the most desirable locations for development in the East Bay. It is no longer necessary to lure developers with big subsidies (the $47 million, for example).

Residents defended their right to be involved in every step of the development process and expressed disappointment in the Council for conducting agreements with developers behind closed doors. Most recently, the city met with Madison Marquette to discuss subsidy amounts but refused to disclose them publicly.

“This is our money. This should be above-board and transparent. We’re trying to make a community here," said Brian Donahue, a 28-year resident.

To ensure meaningful community engagement in development decisions, residents asked that the Council require Madison Marquette to enter into a Community Benefits Agreement (CBA). Such an agreement is a legally enforceable contract negotiated between the developer and the community. In exchange for a series of benefits, the developer would receive the community's support for the project.

Hilton Garden employee Elijah Esquival, who spoke on behalf of hotel workers represented by UNITE HERE Local 2850, urged the Council to ensure that future workers have a right to organize a union without intimidation and/or retaliation from employers. Community member Juanita Carrol Young reminded people of the spectacle that transpired at the Woodfin Hotel in Emeryville. The management retaliated against housekeepers who stood up for their rights by firing them and refusing to pay them nearly $250,000 in back wages. Young, who was living at the Woodfin with her young daughter while their nearby condominium was being repaired of a construction defect, was evicted for standing in solidarity with the housekeepers.

“Workers should have a peaceful process; they should not be subjected to the working conditions Woodfin workers had to experience. We don’t want to see picket lines, we don’t want to see boycotts,” Esquival said.

The only union shop in Emeryville, Hilton Garden workers receive wages above $10/hr (higher than other hotel employees in Emeryville), health benefits, pension, and provisions like a new diversity program to hire more African American workers. However, Esquival noted, being the only union in town poses great challenges because of the difficulty in negotiating wage increases because of the low wages paid by competing Emeryville hotels. He said this project is an opportunity to raise standards for hotel workers in the City.

City Council members Nora Davis, Dick Kassis, and Ruth Atkins responded to residents' concerns by espousing the virtues of Reagan trickle-down economics -- that massive amounts of money given to wealthy developers will eventually trickle down to residents and workers. The three councilmembers refused to acknowledge the economic and social costs of their decisions around various developments in the city. Nora Davis boasted about Emeryville's low and moderate income housing, even though the average working person, particularly a retail or hotel employee, cannot afford it.

The Council's message was loud and clear: we know best and the residents should be thankful. Mayor Ken Bukowski revealed that “this project was not meant to be local anyway,” admitting that the Madison Marquette project was simply a regional mall. Despite residents' concerns, the Council voted 4 to 1 (with Councilmember John Fricke dissenting) to grant Madison Marquette continued exclusive rights to the site.

Council member Fricke (who was interrupted six times by Mayor Ken Bukowski while trying to speak to residents) called for a critical evaluation of the Bay Street Site B development, which the Council ignored.

Reem Assil is a community organizer for EBASE. Reem is inspired by both her love for community and her understanding of the importance of building power in the labor movement. Her formative experience with coalition building and community organizing comes out of organizing in the Arab American community, in which her heart lies.

Sandra Stewart
has lived in
Emeryville for 19 years. After attending a neighborhood meeting in 1999, she became interested in the issues of the North Hollis area. She realized that Emeryville’s government needed more transparency in addition to a better response to the opinions of the residents and is now working towards these goals.


Wednesday, September 24, 2008

Sunday, September 14, 2008

Important City Council Meeting, Tuesday, Sept. 16!


IT'S OUR CITY
WE SHOULD HAVE A SAY IN HOW IT GETS DEVELOPED

This Tuesday, September 16th at 7:15 pm, the City Council will be voting to extend the Exclusive Right to Negotiate (ERN) for Madison Marquette, the developer of the future Bay St Site B project. An ERN gives a developer the exclusive right to a site and requires that a City not solicit other developers in the time allotted by the ERN. A typical timeline for an ERN is 6 to 9 months. Madison Marquette has repeatedly extended theirs for the last 3 to 4 years.

Madison Marquette has already asked for a significant amount of subsidy - an estimated $47 MILLION of your tax dollars (see story below: "What the City Doesn't Want You to Know"). We have a right to know what the returns are on the City's investment of our money. If we don't say anything, the City will continue with business as usual-- MORE SPENDING of public money, with NO REAL BENEFITS for the community.

RESIDENTS ARE DEMANDING:

The RIGHT to be meaningfully engaged in every step of the development process. We have a RIGHT to know the amount of the subsidy Madison Marquette is asking for.

Real benefits for a significant investment of public dollars. We have a RIGHT to determine those benefits.

A commitment by the City to negotiate a Community Benefits Agreement with stakeholders if the City chooses to extend Madison Marquette's ERN.

COME OUT AND TELL THE CITY COUNCIL WHAT YOU WANT!

If you don't, who else will?

For more info, please contact Reem Assil, Community Benefits Organizer at EBASE: (510) 910- 0158

To learn more about Community Benefits Agreements, go to http://www.communitybenefits.org


Agitprop Stunt Spurs Park Action


Mysterious Local Activist Slings Mud at City for Stalled Park Project


by Marc Albert


Who did it remains unclear. But after scores of flyers (pictured, left) were pinned to a fence around the future site of a park on Emeryville’s north side, City officials sprung into action. Within 10 days of the flyers being posted – seemingly mocking the City’s lack of progress on the park – residents living near the site received postcards from the City announcing that construction was imminent. The City even launched a park-naming contest. See http://emeryonbay.blogspot.com/


The site, bordered by Hollis, 61st, Doyle and 62nd Streets, was declared blighted by the City about 18 months ago. The City seized the property through eminent domain and quickly demolished the building on the site. Dutro Company, a Utah-based maker of hand trucks, employed more than 40 workers at the site before the City shut them down. Now, 1 ½ years after the City took ownership of the property, the only visible improvement is a chain-link fence to keep the public out.


While the flyers were taken down by city employees, according to http://emeryonbay.blogspot.com/, they appear to have had an impact on City Hall. Soon after, neighbors of the site received notices that park construction was indeed beginning soon, and the city launched a web-based naming contest which has now concluded. Formal banners have been attached to the fence.


As for those boys and girls of summer looking vainly over the fence hoping to swing a bat or lay on some grass, it’s time to learn that Oakland A’s refrain, “Well, maybe next year.”


Marc Albert has been a reporter at three radio stations and seven newspapers over the past 20 years. An East Bay resident since 1987, he lived in Emeryville from 1997 to 2008 and is still keenly interested in a community he considers home.

Friday, September 12, 2008

What the City Council Does Not Want You to Know


A Letter from Council Member John Fricke
(Sent to residents via email on Sept. 4, 2008)

Dear Emeryville neighbors,
Another large development project is moving toward city council approval. Informally referred to as "Site B," the project would expand the Bay Street shopping mall to the north with a department store, a 30-story hotel, and a parking garage. This project is one of several to which the city council will likely give millions of dollars in subsidies to the developer. I would like to report to you the amount of the subsidy contemplated, but the other city council members refused my request to make this information public.

Before I was elected to the city council, I often wondered what occurred in closed session city council meetings (held just prior to the public meetings). After two years of attending these closed meetings, I have observed that the details of development deals are ironed out over several months, and that the eventual city council vote in a subsequent public session is somewhat of a formality.

Given the large subsidy and the scope of the Site B project, I feel that the public should be informed about how much the developer is requesting as a subsidy, and how much the city council is willing to grant. At the end of last night’s closed session, I requested that these two pieces of information be made public. The other city council members present (Ken Bukowski, Nora Davis, and Dick Kassis) did not support my request to make this information public. (Ruth Atkin was excused from the meeting.)

We are now in a period of ironing out the broad details of the Site B project, what amount of retail/hotel/residential will be constructed, how long the developer will have to construct the project, how much subsidy the developer will receive, etc. During this period a developer can hold private meetings with each of the council members, hoping to obtain support of the project by the individual council members. The eventual vote to approve then becomes a formality.

There is an agreement that governs the negotiation between the developer and the city. The agreement includes a confidentiality clause. (I have included this clause at the bottom of this message.) I did not request that we reveal confidential financial information that the developer has disclosed. I simply want to make public the amount of subsidy that the developer is requesting, and the amount that the city council is willing to give as a subsidy.
If we value vigorous public debate, then waiting until the final city council vote to grant the subsidies and entitlements is too late. The public should be able to weigh in now about the merits of giving millions of dollars in subsidies for a project that will exacerbate traffic congestion, and provide no concrete community benefits in return. The other council members prefer to keep this information confidential.
I am therefore limited to reiterating information that the city manager provided two years ago; information I shared with you in my progress report at the end of 2006. Two years ago, the subsidy that was contemplated from the city to the developer was $47 million. (The developer was willing to pay $10 million for the land after toxic remediation. The city expected to pay $17 million to acquire the land, and $10 million to do toxic remediation. The department store was to receive a $22 million subsidy, the hotel $8 million.)

The subsidy money would be drawn from the city’s budget for capital projects. Here is a partial list of projects that the city council has identified as worthy projects, for which no money has been set aside (2006 estimates):

Railroad Quiet Zone, $2M
Park Avenue Park, $3M
Replace police station, $15M
Cultural/Performing Arts Center, $14M
Recreation Center, $5.5M
Improving pedestrian access on Powell Street Bridge, $15M
Bridge over Interstate 80 at 65th Street, $10M
Bridge over Interstate 80 at Temescal Creek, $10M
Extending Bay Trail south of Powell Street, $2M

At a June meeting, the city council voted (4-0) to spend money to create a PowerPoint presentation focusing on the benefits of major development projects while excluding the negative impacts. (I missed the meeting because I was on vacation with my family.) I doubt that the PowerPoint presentation will mention the tens of millions of dollars that the city is doling out in subsidy money. Here is the staff report:
http://www.johnfricke.com/StaffReport17june2008.pdf

See The Secret News story, "All This Development IS Good for You: Just Ask the City Council's Pricey PR expert."

The city council has hired a PR firm to provide one-sided information to the public, but refuses to make public the subsidy amount that will likely be granted to the Site B developer.

John Fricke

Monday, September 8, 2008

A Fresh Start: The Wesley Replacement Search


by Brian Donahue

Now that Stephan Wesley, Emeryville’s disgraced School Superintendent, has resigned after news broke of his faked resume, the critical question is how will a replacement supervisor be named?

Despite attempts by Mayor Ken Bukowski to downplay the severity of Wesley’s offense, referring to a possible ‘rallying around’ Wesley by the School Board and City Council, the Board appropriately accepted Wesley's resignation. Here's the coverage in the SF Chronicle:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/09/04/BA0O12O1UM.DTL&hw=stephen+Wesley&sn=003&sc=400

It is hoped that the same flawed process often used by the City of Emeryville when selecting city staff and school officials will be abandoned for a more transparent and professional process. Historically, cronyism has been the driving force in the political culture here and is often how City officials move up the ranks. Two years ago, $20,000 was spent by the City Council on a nationwide search for someone to replace outgoing City Manager John Flores. But it appeared that the Council planned to select Flores’ number two man, Pat O’Keeffe (who was serving as interim City Manager), all along. The nationwide search was just a show, at taxpayer expense.

This pattern repeated itself when Maurice Kaufman, a Public Works Department employee, was appointed Director of the Department after another nationwide search at taxpayer expense. It should be noted that Wesley served as Assistant Superintendent before being promoted to the top position -- after a nationwide search that cost the City $7,000.

Emeryville residents deserve a REAL search for qualified administrators at the school district and at City Hall, not the sham searches we too often get. A higher level of transparency and professionalism and the elimination of cronyism is required here.

Brian Donahue has lived and worked in Emeryville for 28 years. He and his wife, and young daughter, live in the Emeryville Artists' Cooperative. Brian has been a longtime activist, working for transparent government and better of quality of life for the residents; he's not very popular with the City Council majority.

Friday, September 5, 2008

Welcome Anna Yates


by Sandra Stewart

Teachers and staff of Anna Yates Elementary School had a pleasant surprise last Tuesday when they were treated to lunch by Albert Repola, owner of Ruby's Cafe. It was the final prep day at the school's temporary location before the doors opened to hundreds of students.

Principal Jag Lathan thanked Repola, owner of the Hollis Street eatery, for his generosity. Repola provided lunch for 21 teachers and 10 staff members.

Repola, a 23-year resident of Emeryville, said he wanted to welcome the school to its temporary home at Doyle and 61st streets, the site of the former Ralph Hawley School. Anna Yates, at 41st and Adeline streets, is undergoing a major renovation.
_________________________________________________

Photo: (from left) Principal Jag Lathan, Albert Repola, and support staff Jessica Odon and Pamela Helsel.

Thursday, September 4, 2008

Fool Me Twice, Shame on Me


by Marc Albert

After an unscrupulous grifter bankrupted the Emery Unified School District seven years ago, logic suggests the school board would do everything in its power not to be played like a bunch of small town rubes all over again. Well, logic is apparently in short supply.

The San Francisco Chronicle says it spent a total of $40 uncovering what the District’s $7,000 background check could not. That most of the degrees and credentials claimed by Stephen Wesley, hired in November as Superintendent of Schools in Emeryville, were made up out of whole cloth:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/09/03/BASK12IO7K.DTL

Within hours of the story hitting the streets, Wesley was hitting the bricks. The school board accepted his resignation: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/09/04/BA0O12O1UM.DTL

The current “reform” school board, elected after the former board was purged, has proven itself as incompetent as those they replaced. While Wesley didn’t have the District pick up the tab for a trip to China, leather furniture, or daytime hotel lodging, as his predecessor, J.L. Handy, is alleged to have done in published reports, (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2000/09/22/MN28570.DTL) it is inexcusable that the current board gave the District’s $150,000-a-year top job to a fraudster.

When they ran for office, the reformers said they knew better. Now they are hiding behind the California School Boards Association, an executive search firm paid $7,000 to" find" Wesley (he was an assistant superintendent for the District when he was chosen for the top post) and presumably verify his background. They said the same mistakes wouldn’t be made twice.

For those students of Shakespeare, consider this: The first time is tragedy, the second time farce. The board is expected to release a statement tomorrow. We’ll be watching.

For more background on J.L. Handy click here:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/02/04/MN168452.DTL

Marc Albert has been a reporter at three radio stations and seven newspapers over the past 20 years. An East Bay resident since 1987, he lived in Emeryville from 1997 to 2008 and is still keenly interested in a community he considers home.

Saturday, August 30, 2008

Tree Law Won't Stop Chain Saw


Can Emeryville Be As Tree-Friendly As Oakland Or Berkeley?

By Brian Donahue

A citizen-led drive against the incessant chopping of Emeryville’s trees led the City Council at its final August meeting to change course and strengthen the city's tree ordinance. The Council ordered city staff to study ways to bolster the existing ordinance so it may be revised accordingly. A date for a future hearing has not been set. It seems that the Council's declarations of arboreal love came not from their sudden realization that the city's Urban Forestry Ordinance (UFO) failed to protect the city's trees, but because of unrelenting public pressure.

Council member John Fricke, a vocal and longtime advocate for strengthening the tree ordinance, has stood alone among his fellow Council members in support of stronger protections for the city's trees. After the Aug. 19 meeting, he questioned the sincerity of his colleagues:
“If the City Council actually follows through and adds broader protections to the city’s tree ordinance, the real test will come when a developer asks for a waiver.”

Fricke cited numerous violations of other city ordinances by developers with the Council's nod.

The tree ordinance, approved several years ago in response to citizen concerns, has been touted extensively by Council members in their re-election campaign literature. The trouble is that although Council members used the existing tree ordinance to gain re-election, the ordinance fails to actually protect trees. This has long been obvious to those paying attention in Emeryville, but two recent development projects brought the point home to many city residents. When developers of the - ironically named - Oak Walk project at San Pablo Avenue and 40th Street, and the Glashaus project at 65th and Hollis streets cut down about 20 mature trees at these two sites, it was obvious that the city's tree law was no match for the developers' chain saw.

The biggest problem facing Emeryville’s 3,239 (street) trees is that the tree ordinance allows developers to essentially buy the trees they want to cut down - for a pittance. The law allows developers to pay a minimum “replacement cost” required by state law. For example, $600 was the price paid for a beautiful 50-foot mature cottonwood by the Oak Walk developer. At those prices, developers are cutting down trees all over town - a fate the ordinance was enacted to stop. A plan raising the "replacement cost" for street trees would honor the original intent of the ordinance and is among the points Council members will weigh at a future meeting.

Another problem is that the existing ordinance allows an unelected government bureaucrat, the Director of Public Works, to unilaterally waive fines for those who violate the law and cut down trees without permission. This is what happened with the Pulte project called Glashaus. The entire block of public trees on 65th Street fronting the development site were cut down without permission. After this was brought to the attention of City officials, Pulte, a large national home builder, was given retroactive permission to cut the trees and all fines for breaking the law were waived. This action by the city created a precedent. The message to other developers is they are welcome to do the same. Hey, if you get caught, you’ll only have to pay the amount you would have paid had you sought permission.

Lastly, the Council is to explore the idea of protecting certain privately owned ‘heritage’ trees. Perhaps Emeryville should follow the example of its neighbors, Oakland and Berkeley, which already have such laws in place.

Brian Donahue has lived and worked in Emeryville for 28 years. He and his wife, and young daughter, live in the Emeryville Artists' Cooperative. Brian has been a longtime activist, working for transparent government and better of quality of life for the residents; he's not very popular with the City Council majority.

Friday, August 22, 2008

All This Development IS Good for You: Just Ask the City Council's Pricey PR Expert


$15,000 PowerPoint to "Hone in on Certain Messages"

PROPAGANDA n. Any widespread or systematic dissemination or promotion of particular ideas, practices, etc. to further one’s own cause or to damage an opposing one. Often used disparagingly to connote deception or distortion.


by Brian Donahue

There has been a lot of talk in Emeryville lately about all the new development, and whether or not the community has benefited. Mindful of growing public concern, the City Council is moving to head off public disapproval -- not with a change in direction, but with a pricey public relations campaign aimed at convincing voters that the Council’s development-at-any-cost strategy is paying huge dividends to residents.

The campaign, by the way, is being paid for with your tax dollars . At a Council meeting June 17th, the Council voted (4-0) to spend $15,500 on a PowerPoint presentation extolling the virtues of all the new development and, perhaps more ominously, to smooth the way for increasing the pace of development to come. Helen Bean, the city's Director of Economic Development and Housing, urged the Council to craft the presentation to “hone in on certain messages”.

City Council Member Ruth Atkin stressed that residents need to know how they have benefited, and characterized the PowerPoint as an educational tool. The comment came just moments after Mayor Ken Bukowski and City Council Member Dick Kassis debated whether the proposed presentation should include any mention of the negative impacts recent development has had on the city. Kassis wondered aloud whether the public should receive a more balanced report for their money. However, Bukowski was unequivocal:

"The purpose of this is to put out the positive. What are we going to do, start criticizing ourselves?”
Mayor Ken Bukowski


Siding with Bukowski, Council Member Nora Davis took umbrage at the idea of producing an objective ‘product’ for the taxpayers money: “EBASE (the local community benefits/labor alliance group) will be glad to provide the criticism. We don’t have to do that ourselves,” she said.

Once again, disinformation won the day at City Hall. Educational outreach efforts by EBASE were cited by City Council members as justifying their decision to omit any negative impacts of development in the presentation. During deliberations, this reporter asked council members: If all this development is so great, why would the Council need to spend taxpayer money to convince the taxpayer of something that should be readily apparent? Kassis complained that “EBASE has been running around all over town” telling people they should expect more community benefits from development than they’ve been getting.

City staff recommended hiring the Oakland-based public relations firm, The Place Making Group, to produce the ‘product’, citing their expertise in effective ‘branding’ and advertising. The PowerPoint presentation will be played repeatedly on ETV Channel 27 in lieu of other programming, and will be presented at various civic events the City Council is planning to further this pro-development campaign.

Brian Donahue has lived and worked in Emeryville for 28 years. He and his wife, and young daughter, live in the Emeryville Artists' Cooperative. Brian has been a longtime activist, working for transparent government and better of quality of life for the residents; he's not very popular with the City Council majority.

Tuesday, August 19, 2008

Public Market Development Plan Will Bring More Traffic, Few Benefits to Residents


Developer To Get $10 Million and Street Widening

Residents Might Get a Park – in 20 Years

by Reem Assil

One of Emeryville’s biggest development proposals received a green light last month, when the City Council gave its approval to a major overhaul of the Emeryville Public Market site. The plan is for a sprawling mall and office at the city’s heart. Voting 4-1, the City Council approved a 25-year development plan that will add hundreds of housing units, additional commercial space, and a park to the existing site. The site now has a food court, an office building, and movie theater.

Known officially as the Emeryville Marketplace, the current site is bounded by Shellmound Way, the railroad tracks, 64th Street, and Christie Avenue. The proposed expansion would add additional office space, 52,000 square feet of retail, and up to 340 new housing units on what are now large parking lots.

Council Member John Fricke, the lone dissenter, voiced three major concerns:

  • TMG Partners, the project’s developer, requested and received approvals locking in zoning approval of any combination of residential/commercial/retail for 25 years. Fricke strongly objected to the fact that under the proposal, construction of the future park isn’t required before the year 2028, 20 years from now.
  • The plan involves extensive street-widening that will exacerbate the city's traffic woes and conflicts with the city's stated goal of encouraging more walking and bicycling.
  • TMG Partners is requesting $10 million from the city. The money will likely pay for a parking garage. TMG claims that the return on the city’s investment over the next 25 years will be $60 million. But, the city has yet to recoup any of the millions it gave to Madison Marquette for construction of the Bay Street mall’s parking garage, although similar repayment promises were made. The $10 million for the Marketplace garage will be taken from the city's fund for capital improvements, like public parks and recreational areas.

Many residents spoke on Tuesday night with similar concerns, particularly the seeming unwillingness of the city to take a stand and ask developers for more community benefits. People also said that street widening would result in more traffic, further compromising quality of life for city residents.

Juanita Carrol Young, a Terraces resident, spoke of “real tangible returns” on investment.
“I expect things like bicycle and pedestrian safety, funding for the schools so that my daughter Larissa can have the best education and opportunities possible, and family-sustaining jobs,” she said.

Reem Assil is a community organizer for EBASE. Reem is inspired by both her love for community and her understanding of the importance of building power in the labor movement. Her formative experience with coalition building and community organizing comes out of organizing in the Arab American community, in which her heart lies.